The research investigated the impact of multi-turn interaction on LLM performance. Experiments compared fully specified single-turn input (FULL) with progressively revealed multi-turn interaction (SHARDED) across six task families and five models. Degradation was observed and was dependent on both the task and the model. The study then analyzed completed SHARDED conversations by replaying user messages while editing assistant-generated history – a process termed neutralization. This resulted in a +.027 change in min-max normalized performance across 2,973 trajectories.
Further investigation, termed Turn Surgery, involved altering individual assistant turns. Analysis of 237 degraded trajectories showed that 63.7% contained at least one beneficial intervention, but most positions remained unchanged. In binary tasks, 48.4% experienced a fail-to-success reversal with a single intervention. The research found that task-dependent rather than universal internal signatures linked behaviorally consequential history changes to downstream state differences.
Overall, the research demonstrated that assistant-generated history has active but selective effects on multi-turn performance. This suggests a need for selective rather than uniform history management strategies. The study highlights the importance of understanding how model context influences behavior, particularly in extended interactions.