Imported from borghei/claude-skills (
legal/legal-canned-responses/SKILL.md). Install upstream withnpx skills add borghei/claude-skills --skill legal-canned-responses. Copyright stays with the author (MIT + Commons Clause).
⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL — This skill is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All responsibility for usage rests with the user. Consult qualified legal professionals before acting on any output.
Legal Canned Responses Skill
Overview
Production-ready toolkit for generating templated responses to common legal inquiries with built-in escalation detection. Covers 7 response categories with multiple sub-types each, plus a universal and category-specific escalation trigger system. Designed for legal operations teams handling high volumes of recurring inquiries while ensuring critical matters are routed to counsel.
Table of Contents
- Tools
- Reference Guides
- Workflows
- Response Categories
- Escalation System
- Troubleshooting
- Success Criteria
- Scope & Limitations
- Anti-Patterns
- Tool Reference
Clarify First
Before generating the response, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
- Inquiry category + sub-type — DSR-acknowledgment vs subpoena-objection select completely different templates
- The raw inquiry text — required to run escalation detection first; a litigation, regulator, law-enforcement, or press trigger means STOP and route to counsel, not a templated reply
- Substitution variables — requestor name, dates, matter, and regulation — populate the response; missing values leave placeholders and the wrong timelines (GDPR 30-day vs CCPA 45-day)
Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the response.
Tools
1. Response Generator (scripts/response_generator.py)
Generate formatted legal responses from templates with variable substitution and escalation detection.
python scripts/response_generator.py \
--category dsr --sub-type acknowledgment \
--var requestor_name="Jane Doe" \
--var request_type="access" \
--var request_date="2026-04-10"
python scripts/response_generator.py \
--category nda --sub-type standard-form \
--var counterparty="Acme Corp" \
--var purpose="due diligence" --json
python scripts/response_generator.py \
--category discovery --sub-type initial-notice \
--var matter_name="Smith v. Corp" \
--var custodians="Engineering,Sales"2. Escalation Detector (scripts/escalation_detector.py)
Analyze inquiry text for escalation triggers and recommend routing.
python scripts/escalation_detector.py \
--text "We received a subpoena from the DOJ regarding our pricing practices"
python scripts/escalation_detector.py \
--text "A reporter from the Wall Street Journal is asking about our data practices" --json
python scripts/escalation_detector.py \
--category vendor \
--text "The vendor is threatening litigation over the contract dispute"Reference Guides
| Reference | Purpose |
|---|---|
references/response_templates.md |
Complete templates for all 7 categories with sub-types |
references/escalation_triggers.md |
Universal and category-specific escalation triggers |
Workflows
Template Lifecycle
- Creation -- Draft response template for identified recurring inquiry type
- Review -- Legal counsel reviews template for accuracy, tone, and compliance
- Publication -- Template added to system with metadata, variables, and triggers
- Use -- Staff selects category/sub-type, fills variables, generates response
- Feedback -- Track usage and collect feedback on template effectiveness
- Update -- Revise templates based on feedback, legal changes, or policy updates
- Retirement -- Archive templates that are no longer applicable
Response Generation Workflow
- Classify Inquiry -- Determine category (DSR, NDA, subpoena, etc.) and sub-type
- Check Escalation -- Run escalation detector on inquiry text
- If Escalation Detected -- Stop; route to counsel with escalation report
- If No Escalation -- Generate response with appropriate template and variables
- Review & Send -- Review generated response before sending; adjust if needed
Response Categories
| Category | Sub-Types | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Data Subject Requests (DSR) | acknowledgment, verification, fulfillment, denial, extension | GDPR/CCPA data subject right requests |
| Discovery/Litigation Holds | initial-notice, reminder, modification, release | Litigation hold management |
| Privacy Inquiries | cookies, data-sharing, children, transfers | General privacy questions |
| Vendor Legal Questions | contract-status, amendments, certifications, audit | Vendor/supplier legal matters |
| NDA Requests | standard-form, counterparty-markup, decline, renewal | Non-disclosure agreement lifecycle |
| Subpoena/Legal Process | acknowledgment, objection, extension, compliance | Legal process responses |
| Insurance Notifications | initial-claim, supplemental-info, reservation-of-rights | Insurance claim management |
DSR Sub-Types
| Sub-Type | Use When | Key Variables |
|---|---|---|
| acknowledgment | New DSR received | requestor_name, request_type, request_date |
| verification | Identity verification needed | requestor_name, verification_method |
| fulfillment | Request completed | requestor_name, request_type, data_description |
| denial | Request denied with reason | requestor_name, request_type, denial_reason |
| extension | Need more time | requestor_name, request_type, extension_reason, new_deadline |
Discovery/Litigation Hold Sub-Types
| Sub-Type | Use When | Key Variables |
|---|---|---|
| initial-notice | New litigation hold issued | matter_name, custodians, data_types |
| reminder | Periodic hold reminder | matter_name, reminder_number |
| modification | Hold scope changed | matter_name, modification_description |
| release | Hold lifted | matter_name, release_date |
Escalation System
Universal Triggers (Always Escalate)
| # | Trigger | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Potential or active litigation | Legal exposure requires counsel assessment |
| 2 | Regulatory investigation or inquiry | Regulatory response requires strategic approach |
| 3 | Government or law enforcement contact | Constitutional and procedural rights at stake |
| 4 | Binding legal commitment requested | Cannot create legal obligations without counsel |
| 5 | Criminal liability exposure | Requires immediate counsel involvement |
| 6 | Media attention or press inquiry | Reputational risk requires coordinated response |
| 7 | Unprecedented or novel situation | No template exists; bespoke legal analysis needed |
| 8 | Multi-jurisdictional conflict | Cross-border legal complexity requires expert analysis |
Escalation Response Protocol
- Stop -- Do not send any templated response
- Alert -- Notify designated counsel immediately
- Explain -- Provide escalation context with matched triggers
- Recommend -- Suggest routing based on trigger type
- Draft -- Mark any preliminary draft "FOR COUNSEL REVIEW ONLY"
Troubleshooting
| Problem | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Missing variable in output | Required variable not provided | Check template requirements; provide all required --var parameters |
| Wrong template selected | Category/sub-type mismatch | Review category descriptions; ensure sub-type matches inquiry type |
| False positive escalation | Common words matching trigger patterns | Provide --category to use category-specific triggers; review matched triggers |
| False negative escalation | Inquiry text too vague | Add more context to inquiry text; run both universal and category-specific checks |
| Template too generic | Using default values | Replace all placeholder values with actual organization-specific details |
| Discovery hold sent to wrong custodians | Custodian list outdated | Verify custodian list against current employees and systems |
| Subpoena response not flagged | Missing category context | Always use --category subpoena for legal process; subpoena category always escalates |
| Response tone inappropriate | Wrong audience context | Select appropriate sub-type; customize tone per audience |
Success Criteria
- Response Time: Templated responses generated within 5 minutes vs. 30+ minutes manual drafting
- Escalation Accuracy: 100% of genuine escalation triggers detected (zero false negatives on CRITICAL triggers)
- Template Coverage: Templates cover 80%+ of recurring legal inquiry types
- Consistency: All responses within a category use consistent language, tone, and legal caveats
- Audit Trail: Every generated response logged with category, sub-type, date, and escalation status
Scope & Limitations
This skill covers:
- Template-based response generation for 7 common legal inquiry categories
- Escalation detection using keyword and pattern matching against known triggers
- Variable substitution for organization-specific customization
- Response metadata generation for audit trail purposes
This skill does NOT cover:
- Legal advice or attorney-client privileged analysis
- Automated sending of responses (generation only; human review required)
- Contract drafting, negotiation, or legal document creation
- Case management, docketing, or deadline tracking
- Jurisdiction-specific legal compliance validation of response content
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Better Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Sending templated response without review | May miss context-specific nuances; legal risk | Always review generated response before sending |
| Ignoring escalation triggers | Critical matters mishandled; legal exposure | Run escalation detector on every inquiry; treat all triggers seriously |
| Using templates for novel situations | Templates assume standard scenarios; novel situations need bespoke analysis | Escalate novel situations to counsel; create new template after resolution |
| Hardcoding organization details in templates | Templates become non-portable; updates missed | Use variable substitution; maintain variables in configuration |
| Skipping identity verification for DSRs | GDPR/CCPA require verification before fulfillment | Always send verification sub-type before fulfillment |
Tool Reference
scripts/response_generator.py
Generate formatted legal responses with variable substitution.
usage: response_generator.py [-h] [--json]
--category {dsr,discovery,privacy,vendor,nda,subpoena,insurance}
--sub-type SUB_TYPE
[--var KEY=VALUE [KEY=VALUE ...]]
options:
-h, --help Show help message and exit
--json Output in JSON format
--category Response category
--sub-type Response sub-type within category
--var Variable substitution as KEY=VALUE pairs
scripts/escalation_detector.py
Analyze inquiry text for escalation triggers.
usage: escalation_detector.py [-h] [--json]
--text TEXT
[--category {dsr,discovery,privacy,vendor,nda,subpoena,insurance}]
options:
-h, --help Show help message and exit
--json Output in JSON format
--text Inquiry text to analyze for escalation triggers
--category Optional category for category-specific trigger detection