Imported from lev-os/agents (skills-db/legal/analyzing-insider-buying-signals/SKILL.md). Install upstream with npx skills add lev-os/agents --skill analyzing-insider-buying-signals. Copyright stays with the author.

Analyzing Insider Buying Signals

When To Use

• Screening for management conviction signals ahead of catalyst events (earnings, restructurings, activist campaigns)
• Evaluating whether insider open-market purchases indicate asymmetric upside vs. routine compliance-window buying
• Building or validating an event-driven thesis where insider activity is a supporting data point
• Monitoring cluster buying patterns across multiple insiders at the same issuer within a compressed timeframe

Inputs To Gather

• SEC Form 4 filings for the target issuer (all reporting persons, at least trailing 12 months; 24 months preferred)
• Insider identity and role: CEO, CFO, directors, 10%+ beneficial owners — role materially affects signal weight
• Transaction details: open-market purchases vs. option exercises, gift transactions, or 10b5-1 plan activity (filter out non-discretionary transactions)
• Purchase size: absolute dollar amount and percentage of insider's existing holdings (conviction proxy)
• Company context: market cap, recent price performance, upcoming catalysts, and current valuation multiples
• Historical insider accuracy: prior insider purchases at this issuer and subsequent 6/12-month returns
• Peer/sector insider activity: whether cluster buying is isolated or part of a broader sector pattern

Workflow

1. Pull and clean Form 4 data — Extract all Section 16 filings for the target. Exclude derivative exercises, gifts, and automatic 10b5-1 plan transactions. Retain only discretionary open-market purchases and, separately, flag any open-market sales by the same insiders.

2. Classify each transaction

   • Role weight: C-suite and operating executives > independent directors > 10%+ holders (unless activist)
   • Size weight: purchases exceeding 10% of the insider's prior holdings or >$500K absolute are high-conviction [VERIFY — adjust thresholds for micro-cap vs. large-cap]
   • Timing context: purchases within 30 days post-earnings release, during open windows, or shortly after price dislocations carry different interpretive weight

3. Identify cluster buying — Flag instances where 3+ insiders purchase within a 30-day window. Cluster buying is the single strongest insider signal. Note any contradictory signals (e.g., one insider selling while others buy).

4. Score conviction — Assign a composite conviction score (1–5 scale):

   • 5 — Exceptional: CEO/CFO + multiple directors cluster buying at sizes >20% of prior holdings, no offsetting sales, near 52-week lows
   • 4 — Strong: Multiple C-suite purchases, meaningful dollar amounts, favorable timing
   • 3 — Moderate: Single senior insider purchase of material size, or director cluster buying
   • 2 — Weak: Small purchases, single director, or purchases during routine compliance windows with no unusual context
   • 1 — Noise: Minimal dollar amounts, recent option exercises creating apparent "buys," or 10b5-1 plan artifacts

5. Backtest insider track record — Review prior insider purchases at this issuer over the past 3–5 years. Calculate hit rate (% of purchases followed by positive 6-month and 12-month excess returns vs. sector). Flag if insiders have a history of poorly timed purchases.

6. Contextualize against thesis — Map the insider signal against the broader investment thesis. Determine whether the buying confirms, contradicts, or is orthogonal to your catalyst thesis. Insider buying is a supporting factor, not a standalone thesis.

7. Compile output report — Structure findings per the Output section below.

Output

Structure the analysis report with these sections:

• Executive Summary: One-paragraph signal assessment with conviction score and key takeaway
• Transaction Detail Table: Date, insider name, role, shares purchased, price, dollar amount, % of prior holdings, transaction type
• Cluster Buying Analysis: Timeline visualization of purchases, identification of clusters, offsetting sales
• Conviction Score Breakdown: Score with rationale for each sub-factor (role, size, timing, cluster, track record)
• Historical Accuracy: Table of prior insider purchases and subsequent returns at 3/6/12-month intervals
• Contextual Factors: Catalysts, valuation, sector activity, any contradictory signals
• Limitations and Caveats: Data gaps, assumptions made, factors that could reduce signal reliability

Quality Checks

• Confirm all transactions are sourced from actual Form 4 filings, not aggregated third-party summaries that may omit transaction codes [VERIFY]
• Verify that 10b5-1 plan transactions have been correctly excluded — check for footnotes in Form 4 indicating pre-planned trades
• Ensure conviction scoring is consistent: same criteria applied across all insiders and time periods
• Cross-check for contemporaneous insider sales that would undercut the bullish signal
• Validate that historical return calculations use appropriate benchmarks (sector index, not just S&P 500)
• Flag any insiders subject to pending SEC enforcement actions or restatement risk, which would contaminate the signal
• Note that insider buying data has inherent reporting lags (Form 4 due within 2 business days but late filings are common) [VERIFY]