Prompt file imported from lucasvu1302/codex-usage (
.github/prompts/planning-workflow.prompt.md). Copyright stays with the author.
Choose the lightest useful mode: brainstorm, option comparison, implementation plan, plan review, or execution.
- Anchor the work to files, symbols, Hono routes, shared contracts, schema fields, errors, or user flows.
- Separate verified facts from assumptions and ask only blocking questions.
- For alternatives, compare two or three options by local fit, effort, compatibility, migration risk, and verification cost.
- For a plan, include goal, scope/non-goals, affected paths, ordered steps with acceptance checks, Vitest/Playwright impact, verification, rollback, and open questions.
- For plan review or execution, check stale paths, missing coverage, unsafe commands, contract drift, migration/backfill gaps, and skipped verification.
- Always preserve immutable session JSONL, an external runtime database default,
127.0.0.1binding, and the ban on reading or writing real.envfiles.
Do not create a planning document, require approval for a trivial edit, or mutate Git/PM2/persistent data unless explicitly requested.