Prompt file imported from LuswetiNick/scrappy (
.codex/prompts/dev-team-loop.md). Copyright stays with the author.
Use the dev-team-loop skill.
Feature request:
[PASTE FEATURE HERE]
Act as the root tech lead/orchestrator.
Run this bounded workflow:
-
Update
.codex/team/current-task.md. -
Spawn planner.
- Use code-structure if the feature touches shared mechanics or repeated operational logic.
- Write/update
.codex/team/feature-plan.md. - Do not modify production code.
-
After planner completes, spawn feature_coder.
- Implement only the approved plan.
- Keep the diff small.
- Use code-structure if duplicated operational logic appears.
- Update
.codex/team/decision-log.mdfor important decisions.
-
Spawn test_engineer.
- Add or update relevant tests.
- Run the smallest useful verification commands first.
- Write/update
.codex/team/test-report.md.
-
Spawn code_reviewer.
- Review the final diff against the plan and acceptance criteria.
- Use code-structure to check architecture boundaries.
- Write/update
.codex/team/review-report.md.
-
If tests fail or review requests changes:
- Send the failure/review summary back to feature_coder.
- Then run test_engineer again.
- Then run code_reviewer again.
- Stop after 3 local fix iterations.
-
Do not run greploop unless I explicitly request it and a PR/MR/CL exists.
Final response must include:
- Feature summary
- Plan summary
- Action/service architecture decision
- Implementation summary
- Tests added and results
- Review verdict
- Fix iterations used
- Remaining risks
- Suggested next step