Imported from majiayu000/claude-skill-registry (skills/analysis/anthropologist-analyst/SKILL.md). Install upstream with npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill anthropologist-analyst. Copyright stays with the author.

Anthropologist Analyst Skill

Name: anthropologist-analyst
Author: majiayu000

Purpose

Analyze events through the disciplinary lens of anthropology, applying established anthropological frameworks (cultural materialism, interpretive anthropology, structural anthropology, practice theory), ethnographic methods, and comparative approaches to understand cultural systems, symbolic meanings, social practices, kinship structures, ritual significance, and the relationship between culture, power, and adaptation.

When to Use This Skill

Cultural Conflict Analysis: Understanding clashes between cultural systems, values, or worldviews
Identity and Ethnicity Analysis: Examining ethnic identities, cultural boundaries, and group formation
Ritual and Symbolic Analysis: Understanding ceremonies, rituals, symbols, and their cultural meanings
Kinship and Social Organization: Analyzing family structures, marriage systems, descent, and social organization
Cultural Change Analysis: Understanding acculturation, globalization impacts, cultural persistence and transformation
Cross-Cultural Comparison: Comparing cultural practices, beliefs, and institutions across societies
Indigenous and Minority Issues: Analyzing indigenous rights, cultural preservation, minority-majority relations
Migration and Diaspora: Understanding cultural adaptation, transnational identities, diaspora communities
Material Culture Analysis: Interpreting artifacts, technology, and material practices in cultural context

Core Philosophy: Anthropological Thinking

Anthropological analysis rests on fundamental principles:

Cultural Relativism: Understanding cultural practices and beliefs within their own context rather than judging by external standards. All cultures are equally valid as ways of organizing human life.

Holism: Culture is integrated whole where economic, political, social, religious, and symbolic dimensions interconnect. Understanding any aspect requires understanding the whole system.

Comparison: Cross-cultural comparison reveals patterns of human universality and diversity. What appears natural in one culture is contingent and variable across cultures.

Ethnographic Authority: Deep, immersive fieldwork (participant observation) provides unique insights. Long-term presence reveals meanings and practices invisible to outsiders.

Culture as Contested: Culture is not static or uniform but dynamic, contested, and internally diverse. Power shapes whose version of culture becomes dominant.

Emic vs. Etic Perspectives: Distinguish insider (emic) meanings from outsider (etic) analytical frameworks. Both perspectives are valuable.

Thick Description: Understanding requires detailed, contextualized description capturing layers of meaning, not thin behavioral descriptions.

Bio-Cultural Integration: Humans are simultaneously biological and cultural beings. Culture shapes biology, biology constrains culture.

Theoretical Foundations (Expandable)

Foundation 1: Cultural Materialism (Adaptation and Infrastructure)

Core Premise: Material conditions—technology, environment, economy, population—shape cultural practices, social structures, and ideological systems

Key Thinker: Marvin Harris (1927-2001)

Work: Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for a Science of Culture (1979)
Innovation: Scientific approach to culture prioritizing material factors
Method: Infrastructure → structure → superstructure causation

Three-Level Model:

Infrastructure (material base):

Mode of production: Technology, work patterns, ecosystems exploited
Mode of reproduction: Demography, fertility patterns, population control
Determines other levels through cost-benefit optimization

Structure (social organization):

Political economy: Political systems, division of labor
Domestic economy: Family structure, socialization, gender roles
Shaped by infrastructure, shapes superstructure

Superstructure (ideology and symbolism):

Behavioral and mental superstructure: Art, ritual, religion, values, beliefs
Reflects and legitimates infrastructure and structure

Key Insights:

Practices that appear irrational often have adaptive functions
Sacred cow in India: Ecological adaptation (provides traction, fuel, fertilizer)
Protein taboos: Population-resource balance mechanisms
Warfare patterns: Population pressure and resource competition

Etic Approach: Prioritize observer's scientific categories over participants' explanations (emic). What people say they do (ideology) differs from what they actually do (behavior).

Cultural Ecology: Culture as adaptive system responding to environmental challenges

When to Apply:

Understanding seemingly irrational customs
Explaining cross-cultural variation in subsistence practices
Analyzing relationships between economy and family structure
Understanding resource conflicts
Explaining cultural change in response to technological or environmental shifts

Critiques:

Economic determinism: Overemphasizes material factors
Ignores meaning and agency
Western scientific bias in categorization
Undervalues symbolic and ideological autonomy

Sources:

Foundation 2: Interpretive/Symbolic Anthropology (Meaning and Symbols)

Core Premise: Culture is system of shared meanings. Understanding culture requires interpreting symbols, rituals, and practices from insider perspective.

Key Thinker: Clifford Geertz (1926-2006)

Work: The Interpretation of Cultures (1973)
Innovation: Culture as "webs of significance" humans spin
Method: "Thick description" capturing layers of meaning

Core Concepts:

Culture as Text: Culture is like text to be read and interpreted

Ethnographer interprets meanings actors themselves attach to behavior
Behavior has multiple layers of meaning (wink vs. blink example)

Thick Description:

Not just describing behavior but interpreting its meaning
Example: Balinese cockfight as text about status, masculinity, risk
Captures context, significance, symbolic dimensions

Symbols and Meanings:

Symbols are vehicles of meaning
Rituals condense and dramatize cultural meanings
Understanding requires grasping insider perspective (emic)

Religion as Cultural System:

Religion provides models of reality (worldview) and models for behavior (ethos)
Rituals make beliefs tangible and experienced

Anti-Reductionism: Cannot reduce culture to material factors, psychology, or biology. Culture has autonomous reality as meaning system.

Method: Interpretive ethnography

Immersive fieldwork
Detailed observation and participation
Interpretation of symbolic meanings
Reflexivity about anthropologist's role

Examples:

Balinese cockfight: Status competition, masculinity, Balinese concepts of self
Moroccan bazaar: Trust, communication, information in economic exchange
Deep play: High-stakes activities revealing cultural values

When to Apply:

Analyzing rituals, ceremonies, festivals
Understanding symbolic meanings of practices
Interpreting art, myth, narrative
Understanding religious beliefs and practices
Analyzing identity and self-concepts
Cultural meaning of events or objects

Critiques:

Subjectivity: How do we know interpretation is valid?
Overemphasizes coherence: Cultures may be fragmented
Political naivety: Ignores power and inequality
Aesthetic approach: More literary than scientific

Sources:

Foundation 3: Structural Anthropology (Universal Mental Structures)

Core Premise: Universal structures of human mind generate cultural diversity. Deep structures underlie surface variations across cultures.

Key Thinker: Claude Lévi-Strauss (1908-2009)

Work: Structural Anthropology (1958), The Savage Mind (1962)
Innovation: Applied linguistic structuralism to culture
Method: Identifying binary oppositions and transformations

Key Concepts:

Binary Oppositions: Human thought organized around oppositions

Nature/culture, raw/cooked, male/female, sacred/profane, life/death
Myths and rituals mediate contradictions
Example: Totemic systems classify nature using cultural categories

Myth Analysis:

Myths are collective expressions of universal structural patterns
Variants of myths are transformations of common structure
Myths address logical contradictions (life/death, nature/culture)
Example: Oedipus myth as meditation on autochthony vs. sexual reproduction

Kinship as Language:

Kinship systems are communication systems like language
Elementary structures: Positive marriage rules (prescribe whom to marry)
Exchange of women creates social bonds between groups
Reciprocity is fundamental principle

Savage vs. Scientific Mind:

Bricolage (savage thought): Assembles using available cultural materials
Both "savage" and "scientific" thought are logical and systematic
"Primitive" societies have complex classification systems (totems, myths)
Challenges evolutionary hierarchy of cultures

Structural Method:

Collect variants of cultural phenomena (myths, kinship, totems)
Identify elements and relationships
Discover underlying structure (binary oppositions, transformations)
Show how structure generates variants

When to Apply:

Analyzing myths, folktales, narratives
Understanding classification systems (totems, cosmologies)
Kinship systems analysis
Symbolic boundaries and categories
Cross-cultural patterns in thought

Critiques:

Ahistorical: Ignores historical change
Mentalist: Overemphasizes cognition
Universalism: Imposes Western logic on non-Western cultures
Ignores power, inequality, agency

Sources:

Foundation 4: Practice Theory (Agency, Structure, and Habitus)

Core Premise: Culture is not just ideas or structures but embodied practices. Individuals reproduce and transform culture through everyday practices shaped by structured dispositions.

Key Thinker: Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002) (Sociologist/Anthropologist)

Work: Outline of a Theory of Practice (1972), The Logic of Practice (1980)
Innovation: Bridging structure and agency through practice
Method: Ethnography of everyday practices in Algeria and France

Core Concepts:

Habitus: Durable dispositions acquired through socialization

"Structured structures predisposed to function as structuring structures"
Unconscious schemes of perception, thought, action
Shaped by past experiences, generates future practices
Makes cultural practices feel natural ("that's just how things are done")
Example: Class-specific tastes, manners, bodily hexis

Capital (multiple forms):

Economic capital: Money, property, assets
Cultural capital: Education, knowledge, skills, tastes, credentials
Social capital: Networks, connections, group membership
Symbolic capital: Honor, prestige, recognition, legitimacy
Capitals are convertible but at cost

Field: Arena of struggle over specific capital

Each field has its own logic, rules, stakes (academic field, artistic field, political field)
Positions in field defined by capital distribution
Actors struggle to accumulate capital and define field rules

Practice: Habitus + Capital + Field → Practice

Practices neither freely chosen nor mechanically determined
Strategic but not consciously calculated
"Regulated improvisations" (like jazz)

Distinction and Taste:

Taste is not natural but socially constructed
Class-specific habitus produces class-specific tastes
Taste distinctions legitimate inequality ("they just have poor taste")

Doxa: Taken-for-granted assumptions that go unquestioned

What is "obvious" and "natural"
Challenges require orthodoxy (explicit defense) or heterodoxy (critique)

Symbolic Violence: Domination accepted as legitimate by dominated

Subordinate groups internalize dominant classifications
Misrecognition of arbitrary cultural practices as natural

Ethnographic Examples:

Kabyle house in Algeria: Spatial organization embodies gender, cosmology, social relations
French taste: Class-specific aesthetic preferences reproduce inequality

When to Apply:

Understanding how culture is embodied
Analyzing class, status, and cultural reproduction
Explaining why inequality persists (symbolic violence)
Understanding socialization and habitus formation
Analyzing everyday practices and routines
Cultural capital and education
Taste, consumption, and distinction

Critiques:

Determinism: Habitus leaves little room for agency or change
Economistic: Reduces culture to capital accumulation
Pessimistic: Change seems impossible
Intellectual bias: Privilege of observer

Sources:

Foundation 5: Postcolonial and Decolonial Anthropology

Core Premise: Anthropology was complicit in colonialism. Critical reflexivity about power, knowledge production, and representation is essential. Decolonize anthropology by centering indigenous knowledge and challenging Western epistemologies.

Historical Context:

Anthropology developed during colonial era
Ethnographic knowledge served colonial administration
"Savage" vs. "civilized" dichotomy justified domination
Anthropological subjects were colonized peoples

Key Critiques:

"Othering" (Edward Said, Orientalism 1978):

Western knowledge about non-West constructed "Orient" as opposite of "Occident"
Representations served imperial power
Anthropology participated in creating exotic, primitive "Other"

Crisis of Representation (Writing Culture, 1986):

Ethnography is literary construction, not objective truth
Anthropologist's authority questioned
Whose voices are heard in ethnographies?
Power relations in knowledge production

Indigenous Critique:

"Studying down": Anthropology studies marginalized, not powerful
Extraction: Taking knowledge without reciprocity
Representation: Speaking for rather than with
Cultural appropriation and misrepresentation

Decolonial Turns:

Native Anthropology: Anthropologists from studied communities

Insider perspective with analytical training
Challenges Western monopoly on knowledge production

Collaborative Ethnography: Research with, not on

Co-authorship with community members
Shared authority and interpretation
Community control over representation

Applied and Engaged Anthropology: Using anthropology for community goals

Cultural preservation
Land rights advocacy
Development critique
Policy intervention

Decolonizing Methodology (Linda Tuhiwai Smith):

Center indigenous knowledge systems
Challenge Western research ethics
Research as part of decolonization struggle

Epistemic Justice: Recognize multiple ways of knowing

Indigenous science, oral traditions, embodied knowledge
Challenge Western epistemological hegemony

When to Apply:

Analyzing power in knowledge production
Understanding colonial legacies
Examining representation of marginalized groups
Evaluating research ethics
Indigenous rights and cultural preservation
Critiquing Western universalism

Contemporary Movements:

Land Back movements
Cultural repatriation (objects, remains, knowledge)
Indigenous data sovereignty
Decolonizing museums and academia

Sources:

Core Analytical Frameworks (Expandable)

Framework 1: Kinship and Social Organization

Purpose: Analyze how societies organize social relationships through kinship, descent, marriage, and residence

Key Concepts:

Descent Systems:

Unilineal descent: Trace through one parent only
- Patrilineal: Through fathers (majority of societies)
- Matrilineal: Through mothers (15-20% of societies)
Bilateral/Cognatic: Through both parents (Western societies, flexible)
Double descent: Both patrilineal and matrilineal for different purposes

Marriage Systems:

Monogamy: One spouse
Polygyny: One man, multiple wives (most common plural marriage)
Polyandry: One woman, multiple husbands (rare, often fraternal)
Marriage rules:
- Exogamy: Marry outside group (clan, lineage)
- Endogamy: Marry within group (caste, class, religion)
- Cross-cousin marriage: Mother's brother's child or father's sister's child
- Parallel-cousin marriage: Same-sex siblings' children

Residence Patterns:

Patrilocal: Live with or near husband's family (most common)
Matrilocal: Live with or near wife's family
Neolocal: Establish new residence (industrial societies)
Bilocal: Choice of either family

Kinship Terminology: Linguistic categories reveal social organization

Hawaiian: Few distinctions, emphasizes generation
Eskimo: Nuclear family distinguished (Western)
Iroquois: Parallel vs. cross relatives distinguished
Omaha/Crow: Complex systems reflecting unilineal descent

Functions of Kinship:

Organizing inheritance and succession
Defining rights and obligations
Creating alliances between groups
Regulating sexuality and reproduction
Social security and support networks

Cross-Cultural Patterns:

Patrilineal descent correlates with patrilocal residence, warfare, agriculture
Matrilineal descent often with horticulture, internal warfare
Bilateral descent common in foraging and industrial societies
Marriage exchanges create political alliances

When to Apply:

Understanding family structures
Analyzing inheritance and succession
Understanding social organization
Marriage politics and alliances
Gender roles and inequality
Identity and group membership

Sources:

Kinship - Wikipedia
Classic works: Lewis Henry Morgan, Meyer Fortes, Claude Lévi-Strauss

Framework 2: Ritual and Symbolic Analysis

Purpose: Interpret rituals, ceremonies, and symbolic practices in cultural context

What is Ritual?:

Formalized, patterned behavior
Symbolic and expressive
Often repetitive and traditional
Marking transitions, expressing values, creating community

Types of Rituals:

Rites of Passage (Arnold van Gennep):

Mark life transitions: birth, puberty, marriage, death
Three phases:
1. Separation: Individual separated from previous status
2. Liminality: Betwixt and between, ambiguous status (Victor Turner)
3. Reincorporation: Individual reintegrated with new status
Examples: Bar/Bat Mitzvah, graduation ceremonies, weddings, funerals

Religious Rituals:

Worship and offerings
Prayer and meditation
Festivals and pilgrimages
Sacrifice and purification

Political Rituals:

Coronations and inaugurations
Parades and national celebrations
Protests and demonstrations
Rituals of deference and authority

Healing Rituals:

Shamanic practices
Exorcism
Traditional medicine ceremonies
Combining symbolic and physical healing

Ritual Functions (Durkheim, Turner):

Creating social solidarity and collective effervescence
Marking and managing transitions
Expressing and reinforcing values
Managing anxiety and uncertainty
Legitimating authority and social order
Creating communitas (anti-structural, egalitarian bonds)

Symbolic Analysis:

Symbols: Objects, actions, or words standing for something else

Multivocal: Multiple meanings simultaneously
Condensed: Pack many meanings into single symbol
Polysemic: Mean different things to different people

Dominant vs. Instrumental Symbols (Turner):

Dominant symbols: Core cultural values (flag, cross, totems)
Instrumental symbols: Support ritual action

Ritual as Performance:

Not just belief but embodied practice
Creates effects through doing
Performative power (saying/doing makes it so)
Example: "I now pronounce you married" performatively creates marriage

When to Apply:

Analyzing ceremonies and festivals
Understanding life transitions
Interpreting religious practices
Political spectacles and symbolism
Understanding cultural values through ritual
Analyzing healing and therapeutic practices
Identity formation and community building

Sources:

Ritual - Wikipedia
Victor Turner, The Ritual Process (1969)
Arnold van Gennep, The Rites of Passage (1909)

Framework 3: Economic Anthropology and Exchange

Purpose: Understand economic practices as culturally embedded, not universal rational calculation

Three Forms of Economic Integration (Karl Polanyi):

Reciprocity: Exchange based on social relationships

Generalized reciprocity: Giving without expectation of immediate return (family, close friends)
Balanced reciprocity: Expectation of equivalent return (trade partners)
Negative reciprocity: Attempt to get better deal (strangers, enemies)
Social relations more important than material gain

Redistribution: Central collection and allocation

Chiefs, states, or religious institutions collect resources
Redistribute according to social rules
Creates hierarchy and political power
Examples: Potlatch, taxation and welfare systems

Market Exchange: Price-setting through supply and demand

Impersonal exchange
Profit motive
Commodification
Historically recent and culturally specific (not universal)

Gift Economy (Marcel Mauss):

Gifts create obligations
Three obligations: to give, to receive, to reciprocate
Gifts build social relationships and prestige
"Spirit of the gift" connects giver, gift, and receiver
Examples: Kula ring (Trobriand), potlatch (Northwest Coast)

Substantivism vs. Formalism Debate:

Substantivists (Polanyi): Economy embedded in social relations; economic principles vary culturally
Formalists: Universal rational choice; apply economic models cross-culturally
Middle ground: Some universal principles, but culturally shaped

Commodification and Alienation:

Turning social relations and nature into commodities
Separates producers from products
Calculability and quantification
Cultural resistance to commodification (sacred objects, body parts, relationships)

When to Apply:

Understanding economic practices in non-market societies
Analyzing gift-giving and exchange
Understanding redistribution systems
Critiquing market fundamentalism
Analyzing informal economies
Understanding resistance to commodification
Development and economic change

Sources:

Economic Anthropology - Wikipedia
Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation (1944)
Marcel Mauss, The Gift (1925)

Framework 4: Power, Inequality, and Resistance

Purpose: Analyze how power operates through culture and how people resist domination

Hegemony (Gramsci via anthropology):

Domination through consent, not just coercion
Ruling ideas are ideas of ruling class
Culture naturalizes inequality
Counter-hegemonic cultures challenge dominant norms

Everyday Forms of Resistance (James C. Scott):

Hidden transcripts: Critiques expressed backstage
Public transcripts: Performances for dominant groups
Weapons of the weak: Foot-dragging, sabotage, dissimulation, false compliance
Infrapolitics: Under-the-radar resistance
Example: Peasants appear compliant but subtly resist

Culture and Power:

Culture is contested terrain, not consensus
Dominant groups impose meanings
Subordinate groups resist and create alternative meanings
Struggle over symbols and representations

Structural Violence (Paul Farmer):

Violence embedded in social structures
Poverty, inequality, racism as violence
Suffered by marginalized groups
Naturalized and invisible
Example: Preventable diseases in Haiti as structural violence

Gender and Power:

Gender as cultural construction
Patriarchy maintained through culture (ideology, practice, structure)
Women's agency and resistance
Example: Veiling as simultaneously oppression and resistance

Colonialism and Cultural Hegemony:

Colonial culture imposed as "civilized"
Indigenous cultures denigrated
Internalization of colonial values
Cultural resistance and revitalization movements

When to Apply:

Understanding how power operates culturally
Analyzing inequality and domination
Identifying forms of resistance
Understanding consciousness and ideology
Analyzing marginalization and vulnerability
Social movements and cultural politics
Decolonization struggles

Sources:

James C. Scott, Weapons of the Weak (1985), Domination and the Arts of Resistance (1990)
Paul Farmer, Pathologies of Power (2003)

Framework 5: Ethnographic Method and Reflexivity

Purpose: Conduct culturally sensitive research with awareness of power dynamics and epistemological issues

Participant Observation: Core ethnographic method

Long-term immersion in community (12-24 months traditional)
Participate in daily life while observing
Build rapport and trust
Learn language (essential)
Experience culture from inside

Key Principles:

Cultural Relativism in Practice:

Suspend judgment, understand on own terms
Doesn't mean ethical relativism (can still critique)
Empathetic understanding without endorsement

Holistic Perspective:

Connect specific practices to broader cultural context
Understand interconnections
Multiple domains (economy, kinship, religion, politics)

Emic vs. Etic:

Emic: Insider meanings and categories
Etic: Outsider analytical frameworks
Both necessary; tension productive

Reflexivity: Self-awareness about position and influence

How does researcher's identity shape research?
How does presence affect what is studied?
Power dynamics in research relationship
Positionality: Race, gender, class, nationality shape access and interpretation

Ethical Considerations:

Informed consent
Confidentiality and anonymity
Do no harm
Reciprocity and giving back
Community review and approval
Cultural sensitivity around sacred knowledge

Challenges:

Rapport vs. objectivity tension
Going native (losing analytical distance)
Observer effect (changing what is studied)
Selective perception
Interpretation validity

Writing Ethnography:

Thick description (Geertz)
Balance emic and etic perspectives
Acknowledge partiality and situated knowledge
Represent complexity, not caricature
Ethical representation

When to Apply:

Designing ethnographic research
Evaluating ethnographic claims
Understanding researcher positionality
Assessing representation ethics
Critiquing anthropological knowledge production

Sources:

Bronislaw Malinowski, Argonauts of the Western Pacific (1922) - Foundational method
Clifford & Marcus, Writing Culture (1986) - Reflexive turn

Methodological Approaches (Expandable)

Method 1: Classic Ethnography (Immersive Fieldwork)

Definition: Long-term, immersive research in community using participant observation

Process:

Preparation: Learn language, background research, logistics, ethics approval
Entry: Gain access, establish rapport, navigate gatekeepers
Immersion: Daily participation and observation, 12-24 months
Data Collection: Field notes, interviews, photographs, recordings, artifacts
Analysis: Coding, pattern identification, interpretation
Writing: Ethnographic narrative balancing description and analysis

Data Types:

Field notes: Detailed observations and reflections
Interviews: Life histories, structured/semi-structured
Genealogies: Kinship networks
Census data: Demographics
Material culture: Artifacts, built environment
Visual data: Photography, video, drawings

Strengths:

Deep contextual understanding
Insider perspective
Holistic view
Uncover unconscious patterns
Flexibility to pursue unexpected findings

Limitations:

Time-intensive
Small scale (usually one community)
Generalizability questions
Researcher bias and selective perception
Ethics of observation

Method 2: Multi-Sited Ethnography

Purpose: Follow cultural phenomena across multiple field sites

Rationale:

Globalization requires studying transnational flows
People, objects, meanings move across sites
Culture no longer bounded in single location
"Follow the people, object, metaphor, story, conflict" (George Marcus)

Examples:

Diaspora communities across multiple countries
Global commodity chains (from production to consumption)
Transnational social movements
Migration circuits
International organizations

Process:

Identify strategic sites connected by phenomenon
Conduct fieldwork in multiple locations
Trace connections and flows
Compare and contrast across sites

Strengths:

Captures transnational dynamics
Reveals connections across sites
Decenters single-site perspective

Challenges:

Less depth in each site
Logistics and resources
Maintaining relationships across sites

Source: George Marcus, "Ethnography in/of the World System" (1995)

Method 3: Ethnohistory

Purpose: Combine ethnographic and historical methods to understand cultural change over time

Approach:

Use historical documents (archives, colonial records, missionaries' accounts)
Combine with oral histories
Ethnographic present and historical depth
Trace cultural continuity and change

Sources:

Colonial archives
Missionaries' reports
Travelers' accounts
Government records
Oral traditions
Archaeological evidence

Strengths:

Temporal depth
Understand change and continuity
Challenge ahistorical ethnography
Recover indigenous history

Challenges:

Biased historical sources (often colonial)
Fragmentary records
Interpreting across time

Examples:

Indigenous responses to colonialism
Culture contact and exchange
Development of creole cultures
Historical trauma and memory

Method 4: Visual and Material Culture Analysis

Purpose: Analyze artifacts, images, built environment, and material practices

Material Culture:

Objects embody cultural meanings
Technology reflects and shapes culture
Use patterns reveal social relations
Style and aesthetics express identity

Visual Anthropology:

Photography and film as data and representation
Indigenous media production
Visual analysis methods
Ethical representation

Built Environment:

Architecture reflects cosmology and social organization
Spatial organization embodies power relations
Example: Bourdieu's Kabyle house analysis

Strengths:

Tangible evidence
Access to past cultures (archaeology)
Cross-cultural comparison
Multisensory understanding

Method 5: Applied and Collaborative Methods

Purpose: Research with communities for practical goals and social justice

Applied Anthropology:

Use anthropology to address real-world problems
Work with communities, NGOs, governments
Development, health, education, environment, policy
Advocacy and activism

Collaborative Ethnography:

Research with, not on communities
Co-design research questions
Shared interpretation and analysis
Co-authorship
Community control over data and representation

Participatory Action Research (PAR):

Community members as co-researchers
Research serves community goals
Action and reflection cycles
Empowerment and social change

Examples:

Indigenous land rights documentation
Cultural impact assessments
Community-based conservation
Refugee resettlement programs
Language revitalization

Ethics:

Whose interests does research serve?
Reciprocity and giving back
Community benefit
Avoiding extraction

Analysis Rubric

What to Examine

Cultural Systems and Meanings:

What are core cultural values and beliefs?
What symbols carry cultural significance?
How do people interpret events and practices?
What worldviews and cosmologies operate?

Social Organization:

How is society organized (kinship, class, ethnicity)?
What are kinship and descent patterns?
How are gender roles defined and enacted?
What social hierarchies exist?

Practices and Performances:

What are everyday practices and routines?
What rituals and ceremonies occur?
How are identities performed?
What embodied knowledge exists?

Material Culture:

What artifacts and technologies are used?
How is space organized?
What do objects signify?
How is material culture distributed?

Power and Inequality:

How is power culturally expressed?
What forms of inequality exist?
How is domination naturalized?
What forms of resistance occur?

Cultural Change and Continuity:

What is changing? What persists?
How do people adapt to change?
What tensions exist between tradition and modernity?
How is culture contested and negotiated?

Questions to Ask

Meaning Questions:

What does this mean to cultural insiders?
What symbolic significance does this have?
How do people interpret this?
What cultural logics operate?

Comparison Questions:

How does this compare across cultures?
What patterns are universal? What varies?
How does cultural context shape this?
What can comparison reveal?

Function Questions:

What purposes does this serve (manifest and latent)?
How does this contribute to social reproduction?
What adaptive value might this have?
What needs does this fulfill?

Power Questions:

Whose interests does this serve?
How does culture reinforce or challenge power?
What is contested? What is taken for granted?
How do people resist or accommodate?

Change Questions:

How has this changed over time?
What drives cultural change?
How do people navigate change?
What tensions arise?

Factors to Consider

Ecological and Material:

Environment and resources
Technology and subsistence
Population and demography
Material conditions

Social Structural:

Kinship and family
Gender relations
Age hierarchies
Class and stratification
Ethnic and racial categories

Cultural and Symbolic:

Language and communication
Religion and cosmology
Values and norms
Symbols and rituals
Aesthetic systems

Historical and Political:

Colonial history
State policies
Historical trauma
Political economy
Globalization impacts

Historical Parallels to Consider

Similar cultural practices in other societies
Historical precedents for cultural change
Colonial and postcolonial patterns
Cultural contact and exchange
Migration and diaspora parallels

Implications to Explore

Cultural Implications:

How does this affect cultural reproduction?
What does this mean for cultural identity?
How might culture change?

Social Implications:

How are social relationships affected?
What are implications for solidarity and conflict?
How does this affect inequality?

Political Implications:

How does this affect power relations?
What are implications for governance?
How might this mobilize or demobilize?

Ethical Implications:

What justice concerns arise?
Whose rights are affected?
What are ethical obligations?

Step-by-Step Analysis Process

Step 1: Identify the Cultural Phenomenon

Actions:

Clearly define what cultural practice, event, or pattern is being analyzed
Establish cultural context (society, community, historical period)
Identify actors and stakeholders involved
Determine scope (local, regional, transnational)

Outputs:

Phenomenon description
Cultural context established
Relevant actors identified

Step 2: Gather Emic Perspectives

Actions:

What do cultural insiders say about this?
How do they interpret and explain it?
What meanings do they attach to it?
What indigenous categories and concepts apply?

Sources:

Ethnographic accounts
Interviews and oral histories
Indigenous texts and media
Community explanations

Outputs:

Emic interpretations documented
Insider meanings captured
Indigenous concepts identified

Step 3: Apply Theoretical Frameworks

Actions:

Select appropriate anthropological theories
Consider what each framework reveals
Apply multiple perspectives for richness

Framework Selection:

Material adaptation → Cultural materialism
Symbolic meaning → Interpretive anthropology
Universal patterns → Structural anthropology
Practice and embodiment → Practice theory
Power and representation → Postcolonial/decolonial

Outputs:

Theoretical interpretations
Multiple analytical perspectives
Theoretical insights

Step 4: Analyze Cultural Meanings and Symbols

Actions:

Identify key symbols and their meanings
Analyze rituals and ceremonies
Interpret symbolic dimensions
Understand cultural logics

Tools:

Symbolic analysis
Ritual interpretation
Thick description
Semiotic analysis

Outputs:

Symbolic meanings identified
Ritual significance understood
Cultural logics articulated

Step 5: Examine Social Organization

Actions:

Map kinship and social relations
Identify social hierarchies and categories
Analyze gender and age systems
Understand social institutions

Tools:

Kinship diagrams
Social network analysis
Organizational mapping
Structural analysis

Outputs:

Social organization documented
Kinship patterns identified
Hierarchies and categories mapped

Step 6: Contextualize Historically

Actions:

Trace historical development
Identify colonial impacts
Understand historical trauma
Recognize path dependence

Sources:

Ethnohistorical research
Colonial archives
Oral histories
Archaeological evidence

Outputs:

Historical context established
Colonial legacies identified
Temporal changes traced

Step 7: Apply Comparative Perspective

Actions:

Compare with similar phenomena in other cultures
Identify cross-cultural patterns
Understand cultural specificity and universals
Draw lessons from comparison

Comparative Questions:

How common is this practice?
What variations exist?
What explains differences?
What is culturally specific vs. universal?

Outputs:

Comparative insights
Cross-cultural patterns identified
Cultural specificity understood

Step 8: Analyze Power and Inequality

Actions:

Identify power relations
Understand how culture reinforces or challenges power
Examine forms of resistance
Analyze structural violence and inequality

Tools:

Power analysis
Hegemony framework
Resistance studies
Structural violence framework

Outputs:

Power dynamics identified
Inequality mechanisms understood
Resistance forms documented

Step 9: Assess Material and Ecological Dimensions

Actions:

Understand material conditions and constraints
Analyze subsistence and economy
Examine environment-culture relationships
Assess technological dimensions

Tools:

Cultural ecology
Economic anthropology
Material culture analysis
Environmental anthropology

Outputs:

Material conditions assessed
Adaptive functions understood
Ecological relationships identified

Step 10: Consider Ethical and Applied Implications

Actions:

Identify ethical issues
Consider rights and justice
Assess policy implications
Evaluate applied anthropology relevance

Ethical Questions:

Who is harmed or helped?
What rights are at stake?
What are anthropologist's responsibilities?
How can anthropology contribute to justice?

Outputs:

Ethical assessment
Rights and justice issues identified
Applied implications articulated

Step 11: Synthesize Anthropological Analysis

Actions:

Integrate emic and etic perspectives
Connect micro practices to macro structures
Reconcile different theoretical insights
Provide holistic understanding
Acknowledge complexity and limitations

Outputs:

Integrated anthropological analysis
Holistic interpretation
Clear conclusions with acknowledged limitations

Usage Examples

Example 1: Ritual Analysis - Quinceanera Celebration

Phenomenon: Quinceanera, coming-of-age celebration for 15-year-old Latina girls

Analysis:

Step 1 - Phenomenon:

Cultural event marking girl's transition to womanhood
Widespread in Latin American and Latino communities
Involves religious ceremony, reception, symbolic rituals
Context: Diaspora communities in U.S., transnational practice

Step 2 - Emic Perspectives:

Families say: Marks girl becoming woman, family pride, cultural tradition, religious significance, community celebration
Girls say: Important milestone, feel grown up, connect to heritage, family expectations
Meanings: Maturity, femininity, family honor, cultural identity, religious devotion

Step 3 - Theoretical Frameworks:

Rite of Passage (van Gennep):

Separation: Girl separated from childhood (preparation, symbolic clothing)
Liminality: During ceremony (betwixt child and adult)
Reincorporation: Reintegrated as young woman (reception, new social role)

Symbolic Anthropology (Geertz):

Rich symbolism: Dress (princess, purity), tiara (royalty), fifteen candles (years), waltz with father (family), court of honor (social network)
Condenses meanings: femininity, family, religion, culture, class aspiration

Diaspora and Identity:

Maintains cultural identity in diaspora
Negotiates between heritage and host culture
Identity performance

Step 4 - Cultural Meanings and Symbols:

White/pink dress: Purity, femininity, innocence
Tiara: Royalty, being princess for a day
Father-daughter waltz: Family bond, father "giving" daughter to society
Religious ceremony: Catholic blessing, spiritual dimension
Court of honor: Social networks, friendship
Reception: Community celebration, family hospitality

Step 5 - Social Organization:

Gender: Marks female transition (no male equivalent)
Reinforces gender roles: femininity, beauty, domesticity
Family: Intergenerational transmission, family pride
Class: Expensive celebrations signal status
Community: Integrates girl into adult community

Step 6 - Historical Context:

Origins in Aztec coming-of-age rituals (syncretism)
Catholic overlay during colonialism
Transforms in diaspora (adapts to U.S. context)
Commercialization in recent decades

Step 7 - Comparative Perspective:

Similar rites of passage: Bat Mitzvah (Jewish), Debut (Filipino), Sweet Sixteen (U.S.)
Cross-cultural patterns: Marking puberty/adolescence, gender differentiation, family and community involvement
Cultural specificity: Quinceañera's Catholic, Latina, family-centered character

Step 8 - Power and Inequality:

Gender: Reinforces traditional femininity and virginity ideals
Class: Expensive celebrations create pressure, display wealth
Cultural capital: Knowing how to perform quinceañera properly
Adaptation and resistance: Some families modify or reject tradition

Step 9 - Material and Economic:

Expensive: Dress, venue, food, entertainment, photography
Economic pressure on families (debt, sacrifice)
Industry has developed (commercial packages)
Class display through elaborateness

Step 10 - Ethical and Applied:

Cultural preservation vs. adaptation debate
Pressure on girls and families (financial, social)
Gender norms: Feminist critique vs. cultural value
Applied: Understanding for educators, social workers, policy makers working with Latino communities

Step 11 - Synthesis:

Quinceañera is complex rite of passage marking girl's transition to womanhood
Functions: Transmits cultural identity, reinforces gender norms, displays family status, creates community solidarity
Symbolic richness condenses multiple meanings: femininity, family, religion, culture, class
Adapts in diaspora while maintaining core meanings
Contested: Some embrace, others critique gender conservatism
Exemplifies how rituals maintain cultural identity, negotiate change, and reproduce social structures

Example 2: Economic Anthropology - Potlatch Among Northwest Coast Indigenous Peoples

Phenomenon: Potlatch, ceremonial feast with massive gift-giving and property destruction

Analysis:

Step 1 - Phenomenon:

Indigenous peoples of Pacific Northwest Coast (Kwakwaka'wakw, Tlingit, Haida, others)
Ceremonial feast where host gives away or destroys vast quantities of wealth
Appears economically irrational from Western perspective
Banned by Canadian government 1884-1951

Step 2 - Emic Perspectives:

Hosts say: Establishes status, honors ancestors, validates claims (names, titles, territories), fulfills obligations, celebrates life events
Recipients say: Witnessing validates claims, creates obligations to reciprocate, distributes wealth
Cultural logic: Generosity equals prestige; wealth only meaningful when given away

Step 3 - Theoretical Frameworks:

Cultural Materialism (Harris):

Function: Redistributes resources in feast-or-famine environment
Prevents accumulation and inequality
Big man competition drives overproduction
Adaptation: Creates social safety net through reciprocity

Gift Economy (Mauss):

Gifts create obligations
Three obligations: give, receive, reciprocate
Gift connects giver and receiver
Status through generosity, not accumulation
"Spirit of the gift" circulates

Symbolic Capital (Bourdieu):

Converts economic capital to symbolic capital (prestige)
Status competition through generosity
Authority validated through redistribution

Step 4 - Cultural Meanings and Symbols:

Copper shields: Prestige items, can be worth tens of thousands
Destruction of property: Ultimate demonstration of wealth and power
Names and titles: Validated through potlatch witnessing
Regalia: Crests, masks embody lineage rights
Oratory: Recitation of genealogies, histories, claims

Step 5 - Social Organization:

Kinship: Potlatches mark life events (birth, marriage, death)
Descent: Matrilineal (many groups), inheritance of names and rights
Chiefs: Validated through potlatch giving
Moieties: Reciprocal relations between social divisions
Ranking: Elaborate status hierarchies displayed and contested

Step 6 - Historical Context:

Pre-contact: Moderate-scale potlatches
19th century: Intensification (European trade goods, population decline)
Depopulation: Concentrated wealth, competing for fewer titles
Colonial ban (1884-1951): Cultural suppression, seen as wasteful and heathen
Revival post-1951: Cultural resurgence and identity

Step 7 - Comparative Perspective:

Similar competitive feasting: Melanesian big man systems, ancient Greek symposia
Gift economies: Kula ring (Trobriand), Moka exchange (PNG)
Redistribution: Many chiefdoms and early states
Status through generosity: Cross-culturally common

Step 8 - Power and Inequality:

Status competition: Wealth only means status if given away
Ranking systems: Elaborate hierarchies
Resistance to accumulation: Ethos opposed to hoarding
Colonial suppression: Banning potlatch attempted cultural genocide
Revival: Assertion of indigenous rights and cultural autonomy

Step 9 - Material and Ecological:

Rich environment: Abundant salmon, marine resources allow surplus
Storage: Technology for preserving fish enables accumulation
Seasonal: Winter ceremonial season after harvest
Trade: European trade goods intensified potlatching (blankets replaced furs)

Step 10 - Ethical and Applied:

Colonial ban was cultural suppression
Contemporary potlatches: Cultural revitalization, political assertion
Land rights: Potlatch validates territorial claims
Applied: Understanding indigenous governance and law

Step 11 - Synthesis:

Potlatch is complex economic and political institution
Multiple functions: Redistribution, status competition, validating claims, social safety net, cultural transmission
Gift economy logic: Wealth is to be given, not hoarded; prestige through generosity
Adaptive: In resource-rich environment, prevents accumulation, redistributes wealth
Symbolic: Validates names, titles, territories through witnessed ceremony
Historically intensified due to depopulation and trade goods
Colonial suppression attempted to eradicate indigenous culture and governance
Contemporary revival asserts indigenous sovereignty and cultural continuity
Challenges Western economic assumptions about rationality and accumulation

Example 3: Ethnicity and Identity - Creation of "Hispanic" Category in U.S.

Phenomenon: "Hispanic/Latino" as pan-ethnic category in U.S. census and popular discourse

Analysis:

Step 1 - Phenomenon:

U.S. census category grouping diverse populations (Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central/South American, etc.)
Created officially in 1970s
Not recognized in countries of origin (people identify by nationality)
Context: Migration, racial politics, bureaucratic categorization

Step 2 - Emic Perspectives:

People say: "I'm Mexican, not Hispanic"; "Latino is political solidarity"; "We're very different cultures"; "It's useful for advocacy"
Contested category: Some embrace, others reject
Meanings vary: Political coalition, shared language, cultural similarity, imposed label

Step 3 - Theoretical Frameworks:

Social Construction:

Ethnic category is socially constructed, not natural
Created through census, bureaucracy, politics
Becomes real through institutionalization and practice

Postcolonial Anthropology:

Colonial logics: Homogenizing diverse peoples
Othering: Constructing "Hispanics" as distinct from "Americans"
Power: State categorization shapes identity

Practice Theory:

People navigate imposed categories
Strategic essentialism: Using category for political goals while recognizing internal diversity

Step 4 - Cultural Meanings and Symbols:

"Hispanic": Emphasizes Spanish colonial heritage (controversial)
"Latino/Latina/Latinx": Emphasizes Latin American origin, more political
Spanish language: Symbolic marker (though not all Spanish speakers are "Latino" and not all "Latinos" speak Spanish)
Symbolic politics: Flags, cultural festivals, foods become markers

Step 5 - Social Organization:

Cross-cuts national origin: Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, etc. have distinct histories, class positions, racialization
Internal diversity: Race (white, Black, indigenous), class, generation, language
Pan-ethnic organizing: Creates coalition but erases differences
Hierarchy: Some nationalities more privileged than others

Step 6 - Historical Context:

Mexican Americans: Conquest of Southwest, labor migration
Puerto Ricans: Colonial subjects, migration after WWII
Cubans: Political refugees, Cold War, Miami enclave
Central Americans: 1980s refugees from civil wars
1970s: Census creates "Hispanic" category for data collection
1960s-70s: Chicano, Nuyorican movements precede pan-ethnic category

Step 7 - Comparative Perspective:

Similar pan-ethnic categories: "Asian American," "Native American," "Black"
All created through political mobilization and state categorization
Tension between imposed category and internal diversity
Strategic essentialism cross-culturally

Step 8 - Power and Inequality:

State power: Government creates categories, shapes identities
Racialization: "Hispanic" becomes racial category despite official "ethnicity" status
Lumping: Erases differences, especially between privileged (e.g., Cuban) and marginalized (e.g., indigenous Guatemalan) groups
Political mobilization: Category enables collective action, representation, resources
Resistance: Many resist category, insist on national origin

Step 9 - Material and Demographic:

Census: Bureaucratic need for categories
Funding: Tied to demographic data (schools, services)
Electoral politics: "Hispanic vote" as demographic bloc
Labor: Racialized labor markets position "Hispanics" distinctly

Step 10 - Ethical and Applied:

Recognition: Need for representation and resources
Erasure: Homogenization ignores internal diversity and inequality
Self-determination: Right to define own identities vs. imposed categories
Applied: Policy must recognize internal diversity within pan-ethnic categories

Step 11 - Synthesis:

"Hispanic/Latino" is socially constructed pan-ethnic category
Created through state bureaucracy (census), politics (coalition-building), and practice
Imposed category: Not recognized in countries of origin
Strategic use: Enables political mobilization, resource claims, representation
Internal diversity: National origin, race, class, generation, language vary enormously
Power: State categorization shapes identity; people navigate and contest categories
Comparative pattern: Similar to other pan-ethnic categories in U.S.
Contemporary debates: "Latinx" vs. "Latino/a," embracing vs. rejecting label
Demonstrates how ethnic categories are constructed, institutionalized, contested, and politically mobilized

Reference Materials (Expandable)

Essential Resources

American Anthropological Association (AAA):

Professional organization for anthropologists
Website: https://americananthro.org/
Four-field approach: Cultural, biological, linguistic, archaeological
Ethics code and professional standards

Major Journals:

American Anthropologist (AAA flagship journal)
American Ethnologist (cultural anthropology)
Cultural Anthropology (critical approaches)
Current Anthropology (cross-cultural, comparative)
Annual Review of Anthropology
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (UK)

Key Subfield Organizations:

Society for Cultural Anthropology
Society for Medical Anthropology
Society for Linguistic Anthropology
Society for Psychological Anthropology

Classic Ethnographies

Bronislaw Malinowski: Argonauts of the Western Pacific (1922)

Trobriand Islands kula exchange
Established participant observation method

E.E. Evans-Pritchard: The Nuer (1940)

Segmentary lineage system, political organization without state
Kinship and descent analysis

Margaret Mead: Coming of Age in Samoa (1928)

Gender and adolescence (controversial)
Culture and personality school

Ruth Benedict: The Chrysanthemum and the Sword (1946)

Japanese culture ("shame culture")
National character studies

Clifford Geertz: The Interpretation of Cultures (1973)

Interpretive anthropology, thick description
Balinese cockfight essay

Victor Turner: The Ritual Process (1969)

Ritual, liminality, communitas
Symbolic analysis

Marshall Sahlins: Stone Age Economics (1972)

Original affluent society
Economic anthropology

Sherry Ortner: High Religion: A Cultural and Political History of Sherpa Buddhism (1989)

Practice theory
Agency and structure

Foundational Theorists

Franz Boas (1858-1942): Father of American anthropology, cultural relativism, four-field approach Claude Lévi-Strauss (1908-2009): Structural anthropology, myth analysis Clifford Geertz (1926-2006): Interpretive anthropology, thick description Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002): Practice theory, habitus, cultural capital Michel Foucault (1926-1984): Power/knowledge, discipline, discourse

Contemporary Classics

Arjun Appadurai: Modernity at Large (1996) - Globalization, cultural flows Anna Tsing: The Mushroom at the End of the World (2015) - Capitalism, multispecies ethnography Sherry Ortner: Anthropology and Social Theory (2006) - Practice theory, agency Philippe Bourgois: In Search of Respect (1995) - Urban poverty, violence, drugs Nancy Scheper-Hughes: Death Without Weeping (1992) - Structural violence, motherhood, Brazil

Verification Checklist

After completing anthropological analysis:

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Pitfall 1: Ethnocentrism

Problem: Judging other cultures by one's own cultural standards
Solution: Practice cultural relativism; understand practices in their own context

Pitfall 2: Essentializing Culture

Problem: Treating culture as static, homogeneous, bounded entity
Solution: Recognize culture as dynamic, contested, internally diverse, and fluid

Pitfall 3: Ignoring Power

Problem: Romanticizing culture without analyzing inequality and domination
Solution: Analyze how power operates through culture; whose culture is represented

Pitfall 4: Privileging Etic Over Emic

Problem: Imposing analytical frameworks without understanding insider meanings
Solution: Prioritize emic perspectives; balance insider and outsider views

Pitfall 5: Ahistorical Analysis

Problem: Treating culture as timeless, ignoring historical change and colonial impacts
Solution: Historicize; understand colonial legacies and cultural change

Pitfall 6: Ignoring Material Conditions

Problem: Analyzing symbols and meanings without material context
Solution: Connect culture to material conditions, economy, environment

Pitfall 7: Armchair Anthropology

Problem: Making claims without ethnographic evidence or fieldwork
Solution: Ground analysis in ethnographic data; acknowledge limitations

Pitfall 8: Uncritical Representation

Problem: Speaking for others without reflexivity about positionality and power
Solution: Pract

Truncated - read the full file at https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/blob/a16e8e7bdddc9a7406a56f51e520cef7a8646208/skills/analysis/anthropologist-analyst/SKILL.md.

About

Anthropologist Analyst Skill

Purpose

When to Use This Skill

Core Philosophy: Anthropological Thinking

Theoretical Foundations (Expandable)

Foundation 1: Cultural Materialism (Adaptation and Infrastructure)

Foundation 2: Interpretive/Symbolic Anthropology (Meaning and Symbols)

Foundation 3: Structural Anthropology (Universal Mental Structures)

Foundation 4: Practice Theory (Agency, Structure, and Habitus)

Foundation 5: Postcolonial and Decolonial Anthropology

Core Analytical Frameworks (Expandable)

Framework 1: Kinship and Social Organization

Framework 2: Ritual and Symbolic Analysis

Framework 3: Economic Anthropology and Exchange

Framework 4: Power, Inequality, and Resistance

Framework 5: Ethnographic Method and Reflexivity

Methodological Approaches (Expandable)

Method 1: Classic Ethnography (Immersive Fieldwork)

Method 2: Multi-Sited Ethnography

Method 3: Ethnohistory

Method 4: Visual and Material Culture Analysis

Method 5: Applied and Collaborative Methods

Analysis Rubric

What to Examine

Questions to Ask

Factors to Consider

Historical Parallels to Consider

Implications to Explore

Step-by-Step Analysis Process

Step 1: Identify the Cultural Phenomenon

Step 2: Gather Emic Perspectives

Step 3: Apply Theoretical Frameworks

Step 4: Analyze Cultural Meanings and Symbols

Step 5: Examine Social Organization

Step 6: Contextualize Historically

Step 7: Apply Comparative Perspective

Step 8: Analyze Power and Inequality

Step 9: Assess Material and Ecological Dimensions

Step 10: Consider Ethical and Applied Implications

Step 11: Synthesize Anthropological Analysis

Usage Examples

Example 1: Ritual Analysis - Quinceanera Celebration

Example 2: Economic Anthropology - Potlatch Among Northwest Coast Indigenous Peoples

Example 3: Ethnicity and Identity - Creation of "Hispanic" Category in U.S.

Reference Materials (Expandable)

Essential Resources

Classic Ethnographies

Foundational Theorists

Contemporary Classics

Verification Checklist

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Use it

Manifest

Reviews