Imported from vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework (
platforms/claude-code-plugin/skills/doc-chg/SKILL.md). Install upstream withnpx skills add vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill doc-chg. Copyright stays with the author.
doc-chg
Purpose
Author a Change Management (CHG) record — the governance overlay for modifying existing SDD artifacts. CHG is NOT a lifecycle layer: no layer number, no readiness score. Triggered on-demand when an artifact must change; quality bar is gate approval, not a numeric score.
Cross-layer scope: a CHG can touch any artifact along
BRD → PRD → EARS → BDD → ADR → SPEC → TDD → IPLAN → Code. Job: classify,
route to the correct gate, trace the cascade, keep the registry honest.
When to Use
Use doc-chg when:
- An existing artifact (any layer) needs a correction, refinement, or cross-layer change.
- A production incident forces an emergency fix that must be documented.
- An external trigger (regulatory, vendor, market) requires a controlled change.
Do not use it to author a brand-new artifact — use the relevant layer skill
(../doc-brd/SKILL.md … ../doc-iplan/SKILL.md). For end-to-end CHG drafting
with minimal prompts, use ../doc-chg-autopilot/SKILL.md.
Prerequisites
Before writing, read:
- Template (source of truth):
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/CHG-TEMPLATE.yaml - CHG overview:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/README.md - Index template:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/CHG-00_index.TEMPLATE.md - Authoring style:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/AUTHORING_STYLE.md - The entry gate for the change source (see routing below), under
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/gates/.
Confirm no ID collision: ls docs/governance/chg/ 2>/dev/null. Reserve the next
free CHG-NN (dash form — CHG carries no hierarchical 4-segment element IDs).
Change-Level Classification (decide first)
Classification drives the entire process. Authority:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/CHG-TEMPLATE.yaml (metadata.change_level).
| Level | Scope | Gate | Process |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Typo, formatting, clarification | None | Fix → commit → done |
| C2 | Section update, requirement refinement | Peer review | Assess impact → update → verify |
| C3 | Cross-layer change, new requirements | Formal gate | Full CHG process + GATE_APPROVAL_FORM |
| Emergency | Critical production issue (P0/P1) | Post-hoc gate + post-mortem | Fix → deploy → document → post-mortem within 48h |
- C1 needs no CHG document beyond the commit; record it if a registry trail is wanted, otherwise just commit.
- C2 requires a CHG document with impact assessment, a rollback plan, and peer review.
- C3 requires the full document plus a formal gate run — hand off to
../gate-check/SKILL.md. - Emergency uses ID format
CHG-EMG-YYYYMMDD-HHMM, populates theemergency_changeblock, deploys the fix, then completes a post-mortem (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/templates/POST_MORTEM-TEMPLATE.md) and a post-hoc gate within 48 hours. All normal CHG sections are still filled retroactively.
Source → Gate Routing
Where the change originates determines the entry gate. Authority:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/README.md and CHG-TEMPLATE.yaml
(metadata.change_source).
| Source | Trigger | Entry Gate | Cascade direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upstream | BRD/PRD change cascading down | GATE-01 | downstream |
| External | Regulatory, vendor, market | GATE-01 | full assessment |
| Midstream | EARS/BDD/ADR change affecting neighbors | GATE-03 | lateral + down |
| Design | SPEC/TDD change | GATE-06 | downstream |
| Execution | IPLAN change | GATE-08 | downstream |
| Feedback | Production feedback, user/defect issues | GATE-CODE | bubble-up |
| Spec | Change to the framework/ spec (template/governance/registry/VERSION) |
GATE-SPEC | meta — no cascade |
Gate definitions live in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/gates/
(GATE-01_BUSINESS_PRODUCT.md, GATE-03_REQUIREMENTS_ARCHITECTURE.md,
GATE-06_DESIGN_TEST.md, GATE-08_IPLAN.md, GATE-CODE_IMPLEMENTATION.md,
GATE-SPEC_FRAMEWORK.md). Running a gate is the job of ../gate-check/SKILL.md;
doc-chg only selects the entry gate and records it.
Spec is target-based, not layer-based. A change to the framework/
spec itself sets change_source: spec, entry_gate: GATE-SPEC, and a
semver_impact (major → C3; minor/patch may be C2; spec change is
never C1). It does not cascade into artifact gates. A platform's own
authoring guidance / runtime is not a spec change — ordinary platform PR.
Cross-Layer Cascade Assessment
The most common CHG failure is incomplete impact assessment. Trace the change along the chain:
BRD → PRD → EARS → BDD → ADR → SPEC → TDD → IPLAN → Code
- Upstream/External changes cascade downstream — a BRD edit can ripple all the way to Code.
- Feedback changes bubble up from Code toward the layer that holds the root cause (the defect may live in TDD, SPEC, ADR, or higher).
- Midstream changes are lateral (EARS↔BDD↔ADR) plus downstream.
For every affected artifact, record in impact_assessment.affected_layers:
artifact ID, what changes, cascade_direction. Avoid the template's listed
anti-patterns (e.g. SPEC change without checking upstream ADR/BDD; BRD change
without cascading the full chain).
Creation Process
- Classify the change level (C1/C2/C3/Emergency) with justification.
- Identify the source and route to the entry gate (table above).
- Reserve the ID — next free
CHG-NN, orCHG-EMG-YYYYMMDD-HHMMfor Emergency. - Populate
CHG-TEMPLATE.yaml:metadata(level, source),change_control,change_description(what/why/trigger),impact_assessment(affected layers + cascade direction + risk),implementation,verification. Addrollback_planfor C2/C3,gate_approvalfor C3, andemergency_changefor Emergency. - Register the change in
CHG-00_index.md(from${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/CHG-00_index.TEMPLATE.md) in the same change. - For C3/Emergency, hand off to
../gate-check/SKILL.mdto run the formal gate and completeGATE_APPROVAL_FORM. For Emergency, also schedule the post-mortem. - Validate (below) and commit the CHG record and index together.
Validation
This skill is the validator (no runtime code). Apply against ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/CHG-TEMPLATE.yaml and ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/README.md.
-
change_levelis one of C1/C2/C3/Emergency and matches the actual scope. -
change_sourceset andentry_gatematches the routing table. -
impact_assessment.affected_layerslists every affected artifact;cascade_directionis correct for the source. -
rollback_planpresent for C2/C3;gate_approvalpresent for C3;emergency_changeblock complete for Emergency (incl.post_mortem_due). - Change registered in
CHG-00_index.md; no broken links. - CHG IDs use dash form
CHG-NN(orCHG-EMG-YYYYMMDD-HHMM); no hierarchical element IDs.
| Code | Meaning | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| CHG-E001 | Change level missing or mismatched to scope | error |
| CHG-E002 | Entry gate does not match change source | error |
| CHG-E003 | Incomplete cascade / impact assessment | error |
| CHG-E004 | Missing rollback (C2/C3) or post-mortem schedule (Emergency) | error |
Quality bar (not a score): CHG passes by gate approval, not a ≥90
readiness score. C1 self-approves; C2 needs peer review; C3/Emergency need a
formal/post-hoc gate via ../gate-check/SKILL.md.
Next Skill
- C3/Emergency →
../gate-check/SKILL.md(formal gate +GATE_APPROVAL_FORM). - Validate the record →
../doc-chg-audit/SKILL.md. - After approval, edit the affected artifacts using their layer skills
(
../doc-brd/SKILL.md…../doc-iplan/SKILL.md).
Related Resources
- Template:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/CHG-TEMPLATE.yaml - Overview:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/README.md - Index template:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/CHG-00_index.TEMPLATE.md - Gates:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/gates/ - Post-mortem:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/chg/templates/POST_MORTEM-TEMPLATE.md - Gate runner:
../gate-check/SKILL.md - End-to-end:
../doc-chg-autopilot/SKILL.md· Audit:../doc-chg-audit/SKILL.md· Fix:../doc-chg-fixer/SKILL.md
Quick Reference
| Purpose | Govern a change to an existing SDD artifact |
| Lifecycle layer? | No — cross-cutting governance overlay |
| Element IDs | CHG-NN (dash) / CHG-EMG-YYYYMMDD-HHMM |
| Key decision | Change level (C1/C2/C3/Emergency) + source routing |
| Quality bar | Gate approval, not a readiness score |
| Next | gate-check (C3/Emergency) |