Prompt file imported from MaineK00n/vuls-data-update (.github/prompts/review.prompt.md). Copyright stays with the author.

/review — Code Review

Name: review
Author: MaineK00n

Review the changes in the current branch against the base branch.

Procedure

Phase 1: Gather Changes

Determine the base branch from the PR target, or default to origin/nightly
Get the diff: git diff <base>...HEAD
List changed files: git diff --name-only <base>...HEAD

Phase 2: Review

Load and apply these instructions before reviewing:

.github/instructions/review.instructions.md — review checklist and severity classification
.github/instructions/go-code.instructions.md — Go code conventions
.github/instructions/golden-test.instructions.md — golden test conventions
.github/instructions/security.instructions.md — security and prompt-injection guidance

For each changed file, check against those guidelines.

Key areas:

Deterministic output: Are Sort()/Compare() updated? Is util.Write used?
Backward compatibility: Do type changes break external consumers?
Golden tests: Are golden files updated? Are new tests added for new functionality?
Security: No hardcoded secrets, input validation at boundaries, no command injection
Error handling: Errors wrapped with context, consistent error patterns

Phase 3: Classify Findings

Classify each finding by severity according to .github/instructions/review.instructions.md.

Phase 4: Report

Output a structured report:

## Review Summary

**Verdict**: APPROVE | APPROVE WITH COMMENTS | REQUEST CHANGES

### Findings

#### CRITICAL
- [ ] ...

#### HIGH
- [ ] ...

#### MEDIUM
- [ ] ...

#### LOW
- [ ] ...

### Notes
- ...

{ "prompt": "# /review — Code Review\n\nReview the changes in the current branch against the base branch.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Phase 1: Gather Changes\n\n1. Determine the base branch from the PR target, or default to `origin/nightly`\n2. Get the diff: `git diff <base>...HEAD`\n3. List changed files: `git diff --name-only <base>...HEAD`\n\n### Phase 2: Review\n\nLoad and apply these instructions before reviewing:\n- `.github/instructions/review.instructions.md` — review checklist and severity classification\n- `.github/instructions/go-code.instructions.md` — Go code conventions\n- `.github/instructions/golden-test.instructions.md` — golden test conventions\n- `.github/instructions/security.instructions.md` — security and prompt-injection guidance\n\nFor each changed file, check against those guidelines.\n\nKey areas:\n- **Deterministic output**: Are `Sort()`/`Compare()` updated? Is `util.Write` used?\n- **Backward compatibility**: Do type changes break external consumers?\n- **Golden tests**: Are golden files updated? Are new tests added for new functionality?\n- **Security**: No hardcoded secrets, input validation at boundaries, no command injection\n- **Error handling**: Errors wrapped with context, consistent error patterns\n\n### Phase 3: Classify Findings\n\nClassify each finding by severity according to `.github/instructions/review.instructions.md`.\n\n### Phase 4: Report\n\nOutput a structured report:\n\n```markdown\n## Review Summary\n\n**Verdict**: APPROVE | APPROVE WITH COMMENTS | REQUEST CHANGES\n\n### Findings\n\n#### CRITICAL\n- [ ] ...\n\n#### HIGH\n- [ ] ...\n\n#### MEDIUM\n- [ ] ...\n\n#### LOW\n- [ ] ...\n\n### Notes\n- ...\n```", "variables": [], "notes": "Review current branch changes with structured checklist and severity classification", "metadata": { "source": { "provider": "github-prompts", "repository": "https://github.com/MaineK00n/vuls-data-update", "path": ".github/prompts/review.prompt.md", "ref": "04ac26097c7da3ef97738a4725344880f99250dd", "url": "https://github.com/MaineK00n/vuls-data-update/blob/04ac26097c7da3ef97738a4725344880f99250dd/.github/prompts/review.prompt.md", "key": "MaineK00n/vuls-data-update/.github/prompts/review.prompt.md" } } }

review

About

/review — Code Review

Procedure

Phase 1: Gather Changes

Phase 2: Review

Phase 3: Classify Findings

Phase 4: Report

Use it

Manifest

Reviews